Which Transition Stocks Give You Exposure to Quantum Infrastructure Without the Bubble Risk?

Hook: Get quantum exposure without buying the headline bubble

If you're a technology leader or IT manager trying to give your organization or portfolio exposure to quantum computing, you face a familiar set of problems: direct quantum stocks are volatile, many pure-play vendors are early-stage and cash-hungry, and the headlines alternate between "quantum advantage" claims and long horizon skepticism. Bank of America's 2024–25 "transition stocks" framing for AI—favoring defense, infrastructure and transition materials over pure-play AI darlings—maps cleanly to a lower-risk path for quantum exposure in 2026. This article translates that thesis into concrete sectors, public companies and a practical investment framework that gives you durable, indirect exposure to quantum infrastructure without gambling on the bubble. For broader macro and supply-chain context, see Tariffs, Supply Chains and Winners: Investment Implications.

Top-line answer (inverted pyramid)

The fastest way to get durable exposure to quantum computing infrastructure while managing bubble risk is to overweight: (1) equipment and materials suppliers that service quantum hardware and advanced semiconductor fabs, (2) instrumentation, cryogenics and control-electronics vendors used by quantum labs, and (3) defense and communications contractors building quantum sensing and quantum-safe systems. Combine these with a disciplined allocation (core-satellite), clear screening criteria and active signals for rebalancing.

Why this works in 2026

• Late 2025 and early 2026 saw governments scale quantum-ready funding and procurement for sensing, communications and hardware testbeds—creating long-term demand for suppliers rather than speculative equity flips.
• Quantum roadmaps are converging around a few durable inputs: cryogenics, ultra-high vacuum, photonics/materials and precision control electronics—areas with established public companies and revenue streams. For thinking about commodity and input volatility that affects these suppliers, consult this editor's table on comparing commodity volatility.
• Large cloud and defense customers prefer established suppliers for supply-chain resilience; that favors diversified equipment/materials names over standalone quantum startups. Cloud cost and procurement dynamics also matter—see news on how cloud pricing changes affect buyer behavior (Major Cloud Provider Per‑Query Cost Cap — What City Data Teams Need to Know).

Map: Bank of America’s transition-stock categories → Quantum exposure plays

Bank of America recommended indirect AI plays via three axes. Below is a mapped list with practical examples and why each axis matters for quantum infrastructure.

1) Defense & national security (quantum sensing, timing, communications)

Why it maps: Governments are the earliest large-scale buyers of quantum sensing, quantum key distribution (QKD) and resilient timing systems. Defense contracts provide multiyear, non-dilutive revenue that de-risks suppliers.

• Who to watch: Large defense primes and aerospace firms (companies with active quantum research arms and government contracting experience). Their balance sheets and program-management capabilities convert lab prototypes into deployed systems.
• Examples: Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon (representative of the defense prime cohort) — these companies are investing in quantum sensing, secure communications R&D and QKD integration.
• Why investors like them: Steady backlog, diversified defense revenue, ability to win classified R&D work that small startups cannot.

2) Infrastructure (fabs, photonics, control electronics, cloud partnerships)

Why it maps: Quantum hardware depends on the same high-precision manufacturing, photonics and control-electronics supply chains used by advanced semiconductors and optical networks. Companies that serve these markets capture quantum demand as an incremental tailwind.

• Who to watch: Semiconductor equipment leaders, photonics firms, and cloud/enterprise vendors enabling quantum access and hybrid workflows.
• Examples: ASML, Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA — they supply lithography, deposition and metrology that underpin next-gen qubit device fabrication. Keysight Technologies and National Instruments supply the microwave instrumentation and test gear quantum teams use daily; software and verification for real‑time control matters here (Software Verification for Real-Time Systems).
• Why investors like them: High barriers to entry, secular capex cycles (semiconductor and photonics investment), and diversified end-markets.

3) Transition materials (specialty chemicals, cryogenics, vacuum, rare substrates)

Why it maps: Qubits require materials and environments—ultra-pure substrates, superconducting metals, cryogenic coolers, vacuum pumps and specialty optics. Suppliers of these inputs already have public footprints and recurring revenue models. Watch commodity and input-price dynamics closely via a commodity-volatility lens (comparing commodity volatility).

• Who to watch: Industrial-gases companies, vacuum and cryogenics vendors, specialty optics and substrate manufacturers.
• Examples: Linde and Air Products (industrial gases and cryogens), suppliers of vacuum/cryogenic systems and specialty optics manufacturers that feed photonics and superconducting-device fabs.
• Why investors like them: These are durable, often oligopolistic markets with long-term service contracts.

Drill-down: Concrete company roles and how they capture quantum demand

Not all companies above provide the same quality of exposure. Below are four functional buckets to guide selection.

1) Advanced semiconductor-equipment and metrology

Role: Fabrication and metrology firms provide the tools to pattern, deposit and inspect quantum-device layers—critical for scaling qubit counts and yield.

• How quantum benefits: As qubit architectures move toward dense integration (silicon spin qubits, superconducting qubits with complex interconnects), fabs require tighter tolerances; equipment spend is lumpy but high-margin.
• Signal to watch: R&D partnerships between qubit vendors and equipment makers; bespoke tools or services tailored to quantum processes.

2) Instrumentation and control-electronics

Role: Precision microwave sources, fast DACs/ADCs, FPGA-based control units and cryo-electronics are the daily bread of quantum labs. Software verification and real-time system reliability play a direct role in control electronics and instrument stacks (see verification guidance).

• How quantum benefits: Frequent instrument upgrades, long-term support contracts, and high-margin professional services for calibration and integration.
• Signal to watch: Recurring revenues from quantum test suites, software toolchains for instrument orchestration, and partnerships with cloud quantum services.

3) Cryogenics, vacuum systems, and packaging materials

Role: Many leading qubit technologies require dilution refrigerators, cryo-cabling and ultra-high vacuum systems—areas served by specialized industrial suppliers.

• How quantum benefits: Demand for installation, field service, and upgraded refrigerators as qubit counts and thermal budget increase.
• Signal to watch: Multi-year service contracts with research labs or hyperscalers building quantum testbeds; growth in cryo-install base outside academia. Macro and supply-chain shocks (tariffs, shipping delays) can move supplier economics—a useful background brief is Tariffs, Supply Chains and Winners.

4) Systems integrators and defense primes

Role: Integrate quantum sensors into platforms, develop quantum-safe communications, and deliver complete systems for customers who cannot operate lab-grade equipment themselves.

• How quantum benefits: Captures the conversion from lab prototypes to deployed capability—prime contractors win where compliance, security and systems deliverables matter.
• Signal to watch: Awarded government contracts mentioning quantum sensing, QKD pilots, or quantum-resistant cryptography implementations. To align procurement and policy moves, public policy playbooks and local-government partnership frameworks are useful (Policy Labs and Digital Resilience).

Practical investment playbook (actionable steps)

Below is a step-by-step framework you can adopt today to construct a transition-stock quantum exposure that aligns with Bank of America’s thesis.

Step 1 — Define horizon and risk budget

• Horizon: 3–7 years is realistic for durable hardware tailwinds; sensing and defense upside can manifest sooner (2–4 years).
• Risk budget: Limit direct pure-quantum startups to a single-digit percent of your quantum allocation; allocate the majority to larger suppliers and defense primes.

Step 2 — Core-satellite allocation

Example allocation for a moderate-risk investor seeking 5% quantum exposure overall:

• Core (70% of quantum bucket): Large-cap equipment, materials and instrumentation firms with diversified revenue (ASML/Applied/Lam/Keysight style).
• Satellite (25%): Defense primes and systems integrators with explicit quantum programs.
• Venture-ish (5%): Pure-play quantum hardware/software names or ETFs for upside—but size this small to manage bubble risk. If you do keep a venture sleeve, make sure startups are operating in regulated or standards-driven niches; guidance for startups adapting to new rules can be helpful (How Startups Must Adapt to Europe’s New AI Rules).

Step 3 — Screening checklist (due diligence)

• Revenue linkage: Are quantum-related products/services a meaningful or growing portion of revenue, or is the company simply marketing association?
• Defense/government contracts: Active awards or R&D grants are a stronger signal than press releases.
• Recurring service revenue: After-sale service, calibration, and installation contracts indicate durable cash flows.
• Supply-chain moat: Proprietary process tech, high capital intensity, or regulatory barriers to entry.
• Balance-sheet health: Cash runway and ability to support long R&D cycles without equity dilution. For a quick read on how supply-side shocks affect companies, revisit the tariffs and supply-chain analysis (tariffs & supply chains).

Step 4 — Monitor practical signals

Use these real-world signals to rebalance or increase exposure:

• Major government procurement programs and awarded contracts in quantum sensing or QKD.
• Full-rate production announcements for quantum-adjacent tools (e.g., a metrology system tailored to qubits).
• Hyperscaler lab-to-cloud transitions where cloud providers contract equipment or infrastructure services; watch cloud pricing and per-query or per-access signals that change buyer economics (cloud per-query cost cap).

Risk management and market-risk controls

Even transition stocks carry risk. Here are concrete controls to minimize bubble exposure while staying invested in the quantum trajectory.

• Valuation discipline: Avoid paying large growth multiples for companies without clear quantum revenue paths; prefer firms where quantum is incremental to a multi-billion revenue base.
• Stagger buying windows: Dollar-cost average across multiple news cycles rather than front-loading purchases ahead of anticipated government announcements.
• Horizon alignment: Match positions to procurement cycles—defense plays often follow fiscal-year award timelines.
• Liquidity and size: Favor companies with sufficient market cap and trading liquidity to avoid execution risk when rebalancing.

Case studies & real-world signals (2025–early 2026)

Here are illustrative, anonymized examples of how these pathways have materialized in recent cycles.

In late 2025 a national research agency awarded multi-year procurement for cryogenic and metrology equipment to a diversified industrial supplier. The award represented service revenues, installation and a multi-year maintenance contract—transforming what had been a speculative single-product story into a durable revenue stream.

Another example: an instrumentation vendor announced a firmware-and-software bundle that integrates with major cloud quantum backends. That shifted the company's positioning from a transactional instrument seller to a recurring-software-plus-services provider, increasing investor appetite and reducing binary risk. For architectures that span quantum and classical inference at the edge, see work on hybrid clusters (Edge Quantum Inference).

Sector-specific watchlist (what to buy and what to avoid)

Buy—durable, indirect exposure

• Advanced equipment manufacturers with diversified end-markets and bespoke quantum tool roadmaps.
• Test-and-measurement firms that are rolling out quantum-specific instrumentation and software for calibration and automation.
• Industrial-gases and cryogenics suppliers with long-term service contracts in research campuses and hyperscaler labs.
• Defense primes with explicit quantum programs and strong program-management teams.

Avoid or size small—high-risk direct plays

• Early-stage pure-play quantum hardware companies with no clear path to commercial revenue within your horizon.
• High-multiple SPACs or IPOs with headline-grabbing quantum claims but limited technical disclosures.

Advanced strategies for institutions and funds

For CIOs, sovereign funds and corporate R&D groups looking to invest at scale, consider these programs:

• Vendor co-investment: Structure minority investments in suppliers that commit capacity or preferential terms for your firm's quantum initiatives.
• Procurement-linked equity: Tie purchasing roadmaps to equity tranches—reward suppliers who hit installation milestones with phased investments.
• Public-private partnerships: Participate in government consortia to get early visibility into procurement and roadmaps. Policy frameworks and digital-resilience playbooks can guide these partnerships (Policy Labs and Digital Resilience).

Future predictions (2026–2028): what to expect

• By 2028, incremental capex from quantum R&D and pilot production will be a measurable line item for equipment and instrumentation firms, lifting revenues modestly but steadily.
• Quantum sensing and timing will be the first commercial revenue drivers outside cloud access—defense and industrial customers will accelerate procurement from 2026 onward.
• Companies that bundle hardware, software orchestration and field service will extract the most durable margins—watch for M&A as larger suppliers buy specialized startups to capture full-system value chains.

Checklist to implement this strategy this quarter

1. Set your quantum allocation and horizon (3–7 years recommended).
2. Build a watchlist of 8–12 companies across equipment, materials, instrumentation and defense primes.
3. Apply the screening checklist (revenue linkage, contracts, recurring services, balance sheet).
4. Allocate using the core-satellite model and dollar-cost average into positions over 3–6 months.
5. Monitor signals: awarded contracts, production announcements, and integrations with cloud/hyperscaler platforms. Use observability and monitoring playbooks to capture real-time signals (Edge Observability).

Final takeaways

Bank of America’s transition-stock thesis—prefer indirect, durable exposures in defense, infrastructure and transition materials—provides a practical blueprint for capturing quantum infrastructure upside without buying headline risk. In 2026 the market rewards firms that translate lab demand into contracted, recurring revenue: think cryogenics & vacuum services, metrology & lithography suppliers, instrumentation vendors adding software, and defense primes integrating quantum systems. Use a disciplined core-satellite allocation, strict screening, and signal-driven rebalancing to benefit from quantum’s long-term upside while avoiding the speculative bubble. For related reads on supply-chain headwinds and cloud economics, see the referenced briefs.

Call-to-action

Want a ready-to-use watchlist and the 12-point due-diligence spreadsheet I use for vetting transition-stock quantum exposure? Subscribe to our newsletter or download the toolkit to get model allocations, screening templates and timely signals updated through 2026.

Related Reading

• Edge Quantum Inference: Running Responsible LLM Inference on Hybrid Quantum‑Classical Clusters
• Tariffs, Supply Chains and Winners: Investment Implications from a Resilient Economy
• Comparing Commodity Volatility: A One‑Page Table for Editors
• Major Cloud Provider Per‑Query Cost Cap — What City Data Teams Need to Know
• Converting a Shed into a Micro-Production Space: Safety, Permits, and Equipment for Jams, Syrups, and Small Batch Foods
• Monetize Sensitive Renter Stories: YouTube’s Policy Shift and Ethical Storytelling
• Deal Sheet: What Creators Should Learn from the Latest Music Industry Moves
• Bluesky & Social Features Every Print Shop Should Know
• Micro Apps and Ephemeral HTTPS: Issuing Short-Lived Certificates for Rapid Prototyping